Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
Group Info Group Founded 7 Years ago Statistics 100 Members
26,167 Pageviews103 Watchers
So the French publication Charlie Hebdo got firebombed last week for satirizing Mohammed in its magazine, and hosting him as guest Editor-In-Chief. "100 lashes if you're not dying of laughter," he says on the cover. It's a cute cover if I do say so.

This week Charlie Hebdo reaches out to the Islamic community in a want to kiss and make up.

Literally.

D'aaaw... :flirty:
Just a reminder that this place is for pictures related to Draw Mohammed Day and the prophet Mohammed.

Thanks and happy arting!
'Fraid I'm a bit late to the party with this one. RL things and all. Sorry about that. But even more unfortunate is another attack on the art world by religious crazies, this time in France.

Piss Christ, for those who don't know, is a photograph taken in 1987 by artist Andres Serrano of a plastic crucifix in a jar of his own urine. It was made as a commentary against the misuse of Christianity, and, if you ask me, is a beautiful picture in its own right.

It had been protested in bursts by self-righteous religious folks ever since, and it finally came to a head last weekend, when some Christian fundamentalists decided to attack the photo with weapons while it was on display in France, and succeeded in destroying it. The photo was recently shielded with plexiglass and assigned guards, because increasing protests brought fear that the photo would be vandalized, but it did little good against the determined onslaught of insipid arrogance. They also destroyed another artwork of Serrano's in the process.

"Civitas, a lobby group that says it aims to re-Christianize France, launched an online petition and mobilised other fundamentalist groups. The staunchly conservative archbishop of Vaucluse, Jean-Pierre Cattenoz, called Piss Christ 'odious' and said he wanted this 'trash' taken off the gallery walls. Last week the gallery complained of "extremist harassment" by fundamentalist Christian groups who wanted the work banned in France.

Lambert, one of France's best known art dealers, complained he was being 'persecuted' by extremists who had sent him tens of thousands of complaint emails and bombarded the museum with spam. He likened the atmosphere to 'a return to the middle ages'."


Even though no one was killed in the attack, it's yet another very clear message from religious bigots that they want to run the show, and will resort to destruction and violence to meet those ends. Yet another example of a religious group who thinks that their beliefs entitle them not only to do whatever they wish, but to demand that others kowtow to their rules as well. They claim Piss Christ is reprehensible because it's supposedly an act of blasphemy (because plastic figures are so sacred? I wonder if they feel the same way about the chocolate crucifixes for sale in grocery stores right now. They certainly didn't bat an eye when they were the ones destroying images of their messiah), but I have to wonder if part of their offense is also in the message of Serrano's art about using their religion to fuel their greed. Perhaps the lady doth protest too much? I certainly can't say I'm surprised to learn that political motivations are involved.

"[T]he movement against Piss Christ had started at the time of President Nicolas Sarkozy's ruling UMP party's controversial debate on religion and secularism in France. At a record low in the polls before next year's presidential election, Sarkozy has been accused of using anti-Muslim and extreme-right rhetoric to appeal to voters and counter the rise of the Front National.

Asked by the daily Libération why the Piss Christ protest had happened now, Mézil pointed to Sarkozy's speech in March lauding "the Christian heritage of France" at Puy-en-Velay, where the first Crusades were preached."


Of course, plenty of people have already pointed fingers toward the "Catholic fringe" responsible for this. The louder message, however, is from the "moderates" who trot out tone arguments and refuse to condemn this atrocious act because of the controversial and "shocking" nature of Piss Christ, as though twisting the knickers of a bunch of pearl-clutching manchildren justifies infiltrating galleries with weapons, attacking people with hammers, and destroying artwork. Because surely, the only artwork worth a damn is what makes us feel warm and fuzzy, instead of what makes us think.

Also telling are the article's examples of "blasphemy" protesters have offered in response, including dropping pee on the Quran and, of all things, The Diary of Anne Frank. Apparently, blasphemy is acceptable to these people if it involves another religion, and they seem to think that everyone else shares their illogical attachments to a book, let alone the idea that any ol' classic is just as "sacred" as their holy books.  They don't seem to realize that it's not the rational people who are getting up in arms over "blasphemy". It's not the rational people who are deeming arbitrary, mass-produced objects too sacred to sully. It's not the rational people who are destroying the property of others in response to a man destroying his own property. Or attacking people over a plastic figure, or a book that anyone can easily buy at any bookstore. They don't seem to realize that they are free to piss on whatever book they want (barring blasphemy laws, anyway, which are also idiotic), because nobody has the right to forbid people from destroying whatever easily obtainable object they managed to buy from Amazon or whatever the fuck.

On the plus side, the gallery is reacting beautifully:

"The gallery director, Eric Mézil, said it would reopen with the destroyed works on show "so people can see what barbarians can do". He said there had been a kind of "inquisition" against the art work."
More Journal Entries

Admins

Founder


:iconm3n747:

Co-Founders


:iconabeautifularmageddon::iconso-chan:

Contributors


:iconbattybuddy::iconmelnazar::iconpjubagoni:

Deviants

Comments


Add a Comment:
 
:iconthedarkheretic:
TheDarkHeretic Featured By Owner Jul 19, 2015
Just wanted tp say that iti pretty cool, that you did this group, freedom expression and speech is one of our most worthfull rights today :happybounce: Love Clap Clap 
Reply
:iconm3n747:
M3n747 Featured By Owner Jul 20, 2015
Thank you!
Reply
:iconthedarkheretic:
TheDarkHeretic Featured By Owner Jul 20, 2015
I thank YOU Hug !
Reply
:iconanatolesting:
ANATOLESTING Featured By Owner Jan 16, 2015
I would just to say one thing: a journalist of Fox News had said than the attack on Charlie Hebdo is normal, because my country is " a country terrorist". When she is interpelled for that, she had declared than they are bad informed. I know than Fox News is channel racist, facist, who considers movement for civil right and respect for envirronement and altruism like a bad thing. A channel of moralist who use religions in a mean way, and on the other hand product show controversy and bland. But now I learn than his journalists are awful, coward and hypocrites. I will never watch a series of the Fox (besides "Married with Children"... at least this series had ended.)
Reply
:iconpatches67:
Patches67 Featured By Owner Jan 7, 2015  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Yo, ho, haul together,

 Hoist the colors high. :icondrawmoday:

Heave ho, thieves and beggars,

Never shall we die.
Reply
:iconpatches67:
Patches67 Featured By Owner Dec 18, 2014  Hobbyist Digital Artist
In response to Sony's inexcusable act of cowardice in pulling their movie from the theatre due to threats of violence I suggest, the same spirit of "Draw A Cartoon of the Prophet Muhammad Day" we create "Draw A Cartoon of North Korea's Leader Getting Assassinated Day" to send a message to our follow artists not allow ourselves to be bullied by threats of violence. 
Reply
:iconm3n747:
M3n747 Featured By Owner Dec 25, 2014
Somehow it doesn't feel right to me, perhaps because it's a little too specific in its approach. I'll leave the matter open for other people's opinions.
Reply
:iconflyinglilypad:
Flyinglilypad Featured By Owner Dec 23, 2014  Hobbyist Photographer
I support the sentiment, but I personally don't feel comfortable drawing fatally violent acts happening to real people. [I support other's people's right to draw whatever they like and feel comfortable with, of course.]

One thing that was good about Draw Mo Day was that it was broad enough to encompass a variety of approaches to free speech regarding drawing him--people did straightfoward, respectful portraits, others did silly comics or sketches, and some people did more offensive stuff (scat, sexual, violence, related stuff etc] (understand given that even the most offensive art should be protected).

I don't know if it a broader campaign would be better or not, I just thought I'd leave my two cents :) I came here thinking about this same issue, wondering if there was maybe a free-speech/free-expression group on DA not specifically focused on the Draw Mohammad Day event, but it appears that this group is really the only free-speech group on DA. [that I could find anyway]
Reply
:iconpatches67:
Patches67 Featured By Owner Edited Jul 18, 2014  Hobbyist Digital Artist
ISIS has threatened to kill the Muslim creator of the comic The Ninety Nine accusing him of mocking Allah

www.digitalspy.ca/comics/news/…

There's no limit to how extreme a position people can take when they threaten to kill someone who is trying to present Islam in a positive manner and never actually drew a cartoon of the prophet himself.  But it's a cartoon, the prophet Muhammad is being referenced to, it's enough to get yourself murdered.  I wish there was a way to make ISIS aware of us. 
Reply
:iconmelnazar:
Melnazar Featured By Owner Aug 10, 2014
That's...kind of sad...
Reply
Add a Comment: